Legal Opinion

Follansbee v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1881PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal by defendant Johnson from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis.

1Opinion of the Court

G-ilfillan, G. J.

On November 5, 1878, Amanda A. and Louis F. Menage made their note to Henry G. Menage, and, to secure it, executed their mortgage upon three lots in Minneapolis. November 19, 1878, they conveyed the lots to defendant. In the deed of conveyance was a clause to the effect that, as a part of the consideration for it, the grantee assumed and agreed to pay the grantor’s note and mortgage. Afterwards the mortgagee assigned the note and mortgage to plaintiff. This is a personal action to recover, on the defendant’s contract with his grantor, the debt secured by the note and mortgage.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. KnappSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Hind v. HoldshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  3. Anthony v. HermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Helms v. KearnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. McDowell v. LaevWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. AschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Conlan v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Beeson v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Brown v. StillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API