Legal Opinion
State v. Holbach
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 2009No. 20080002, 20080003PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mitchell Holbach appeals from criminal judgments entered after a jury found him guilty of stalking and two charges of disobeying a judicial order. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in denying Holbach’s motion to exclude evidence because he was not engaged in constitutionally protected activities and because Holbach does not have standing to argue that N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-07.1 is unconstitutionally vague.
I
[¶ 2] In July 2006, Holbach entered a guilty plea to a charge of stalking Joy Dixon. Holbach was sentenced to serve time in jail and placed on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lutz, David D. v. City of York, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. ElliottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- State v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Simons v. State, Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MontplaisirNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Cruff v. H.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.