Legal Opinion
Cruff v. H.K.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 2010No. 20090149PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] H.K. appeals from a juvenile court order finding she is a delinquent child for committing disorderly conduct. H.K. argues the juvenile court erred by denying her motion to dismiss, admitting evidence beyond the scope of the facts alleged in the petition, and finding she committed disorderly conduct. We hold the juvenile court did not err by denying H.K’s motion to dismiss because the petition sufficiently alleged facts to defend the charge of disorderly conduct and the First Amendment did not prohibit the juvenile court from considering her statements as evidence.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cruff v. A.R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Rebel v. RebelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Landrum v. Workforce Safety and InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- M.M. v. M.M. (In Re M.M.)North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Interest of M.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.