Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1998No. 64401-2PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Petitioners Brian Edward Yates and Orson Henry Lee each seek review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division I, which affirmed decisions by the King County Superior Court concluding RCW 9A.46.110, the statute defining the crime of “stalking,” is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad and does not violate constitu*373tional due process. We granted review of the consolidated cases. We affirm.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

The questions presented in this case are (1) whether there is sufficient evidence in each case to support the findings of “guilty;” (2) whether the stalking statute,1 former RCW…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court · 2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API