Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth GMC Trucks, Inc. v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1959No. 247PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

The defendant in apt time moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is fragmentary and the record contains no final judgment from which an appeal will lie.

Plaintiff contends that on a motion to nonsuit the sufficiency of the evidence to carry the counterclaim to .the jury is a question of law and not a matter of discretion, and, once the motion has been allowed, an order setting aside the ruling is a final judgment on a question of law from which an appeal will lie.

In the first place, the effect of the Judge’s order is the same as if the motion to nonsuit the counterclaim had been…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Artesani Ex Rel. Artesani v. GrittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Barrier v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API