Barrier v. Randolph
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
There has been no adjudication of the rights of the parties. The court did not enter final judgment but simply denied plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. It is well established that an appeal does not lie from a denial of a -motion for judgment on the pleadings. The proper practice was far plaintiffs to except to the ■court's denial of -their said motion and bring forward, this exception in the event of their .appeal 'from an adverse final judgment. Howland v. Stitzer, 240 N.C. 689, 692, 84 S.E. 2d 167; Garrett v. Rose, 236 N.C. 299, 304, 72 S.E. 2d 843; Erickson v. Starling,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Saint Peter's Church v. BragawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Oxendine v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Whitaker v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Cummings v. Dosam, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.