Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Armstrong v. State Board of Examiners

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1962No. 4570PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*496OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The record before us discloses that Leola Armstrong, the relator and petitioner, is an unclassified employee of the Legislative Counsel Bureau. The salary for her employment is not fixed by statute; rather, it is a budgeted item. For the fiscal year 1962-63, the Legislative Counsel Bureau submitted its budget which included, inter alia, a request for $7,764 as salary for relator’s position with the Legislative Counsel Bureau. That sum, together with other amounts, was appropriated to the Legislative Counsel Bureau by the 1961 legislature. The…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. EggersNevada Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State Licensing Board for Contractors v. State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  3. State ex rel. Sears v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  4. State Ex Rel. Keith v. WesterfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Abel v. EggersNevada Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. List v. County of DouglasNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. BOARD OF COM'RS, CITY OF LAS VEGAS v. Dayton Dev. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Whitehead v. NEVADA COM'N JUDICIAL DIS.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API