State ex rel. Abel v. Eggers
Nevada Supreme Court
Original proceeding in mandamus by J. F. Abel, Deputy State Superintendent of Public Instruction, to compel the State Controller to draw his warrant for a certain claim for expenses incurred while absent from his home in the discharge of his duties: The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Talbot, C. J.:
This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent, the state controller, to draw his warrant for a claim approved by the state board of examiners for hotel and kindred expenses, incurred by the. relator in the discharge of his official functions as deputy superintendent of public instruction when absent from the place of his residence.. The facts stated in the petition are admitted by written stipulation, and'a demurrer has been interposed.
1. It is the duty of the state controller to refuse to draw warrants in cases where payment is not authorized…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gibson v. MasonNevada Supreme Court · 1869
- Estate of WalleyNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- State ex rel. Chase v. RogersNevada Supreme Court · 1875
- State v. Ah SamNevada Supreme Court · 1880
- Ex Parte HewlettNevada Supreme Court · 1895
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sellers v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Presson v. PressonNevada Supreme Court · 1915
- Carr v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- State ex rel. Kendall v. ColeNevada Supreme Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.