Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. NEVADA COM'N JUDICIAL DIS.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1994No. 24598PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

906 P.2d 230 (1994)

110 Nev. 128

In re Petition for a Writ of Prohibition or in the Alternative for a Writ of Mandamus.

The Honorable Jerry Carr WHITEHEAD, Petitioner,

v.

NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE, Respondent.[*]

No. 24598.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

February 18, 1994.

Ohlson & Springgate, Hamilton & Lynch, Reno, Gentile, Porter & Kelesis, Laura Wightman FitzSimmons, Las Vegas, for petitioner.

Frankie Sue Del Papa, Atty. Gen., Brooke Nielsen, Deputy Atty. Gen., Carson City; Donald J. Campbell, Las Vegas, for respondent.

OPINION

ZENOFF, Senior Justice.[*]

Statement of the Case

This opinion is…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lagstein v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS, LLOYD'S, LONDONCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Snoeck v. BrussaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Del Papa v. SteffenNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mosley v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API