Legal Opinion
Lynch v. RKS Mortgage Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 21, 2008No. 2:08-cv-01513PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Through this lawsuit, Plaintiffs John Barry Lynch and Barbara J. Lynch (“Plaintiffs”) seek to forestall the non-judicial foreclosure on their home by arguing that the mortgage taken out to fund purchase of the residence violated the provisions of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601, et seq. (“TILA”) and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1639 (“HOEPA”). Plaintiffs’ mortgage was assigned to Defendant Countryside Home, Loans, Inc. (“Countryside”) by the initial lender, Defendant Commitment Lending, after…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Botelho v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Newcomb v. Cambridge Home Loans, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Garcia v. Fannie MaeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Kimball v. Flagstar Bank F.S.B.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Monreal v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.