Legal Opinion
Kimball v. Flagstar Bank F.S.B.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 25, 2012No. Case No. 12cv0429 AJB (BGS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. No. 4) and Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the Complaint (Doc. No. 10). In accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.l, the Court finds these motions suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. Accordingly, the motion hearing scheduled for August 17, 2012 is hereby vacated. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rockridge Trust v. Wells Fargo, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Bisson v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Rojas-Lozano v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Majd v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Doe v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.