Stolz v. Honeycutt

OPINION

NORMAN LEE, Justice (Assigned).

Mark Stolz, d/b/a Paradise Tanning Salon, appeals from a trial court award of $10,906.96 on a subcontractor’s claim brought by Steve Honeycutt d/b/a Honey-cutt Air Conditioning and Refrigeration. Stolz contends that the trial court erred in granting judgment for Honeycutt: (1) because the court lacked jurisdiction over the dispute, (2) because the indemnity bond filed by Stolz precluded recovery against him, and (3) because the claim was other wise settled and released before the lien was filed. Stolz also appeals from the trial court’s refusal to grant…