Legal Opinion

Blessing v. Camas Prairie Railroad Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1940No. 27630PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was brought to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of derailment of a locomotive on which plaintiff was employed at that time as a fireman. The claimed negligence alleged as the proximate cause of the derailment of the train and the consequent injury of plaintiff was the failure of the defendant railway company to provide and maintain a ditch between its track and the hillside.

The cause was submitted to the jury on the question whether the defendant, in the exercise of reasonable care, was required to provide and keep open a ditch along its track at the place…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mattson v. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Gibson v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gooschin v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Topping v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Tope v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Robillard v. Selah-Moxee Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Gresser v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Fred Drew Const. Co. v. MireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Arnhold v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API