Legal Opinion

Robillard v. Selah-Moxee Irrigation District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1959No. 34889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict for the plaintiffs for damages to crops suffered in 1956. The damage resulted from seepage from the irrigation canal which appellant maintains along one boundary of respondents’ property.

Appellant contends there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find that it had been negligent in the construction, operation, or maintenance of its canal or that the damaging water came from its canal. We do not agree.

The only sources of water revealed by the testimony are: The appellant’s canal and the Roza canal, which is located some distance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caylor v. B. C. Motor Transportation, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bloomquist v. Buffelen Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Tope v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Knight v. PangWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Blessing v. Camas Prairie Railroad Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hinzman v. PalmanteerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Detweiler Bros., Inc. v. John Graham & Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1976
  3. State v. TwitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. City of Benton City v. AdrianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Holland v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API