Legal Opinion

Tope v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1937No. 26260. En BancPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, C. J.

Appellants, as plaintiffs, brought this action to recover damages to real property caused by the invasion of surface waters, and to obtain an injunction against the future diversion of such waters to the injury of their property. Trial before the court without a jury resulted in a judgment dismissing the action, following which this appeal was taken.

Appellants, husband and wife, are contract purchasers of a tract of land in King county, described as the south 300 feet of the north 602.64 feet of government lot 1, section 32, township 22 1ST., range 4 E. W. M., located about twenty miles south…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. North Dakota v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Wendel v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. McKoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Noyes v. CosselmanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Whiteside v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Naxera v. WathanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  5. Sigurdson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API