Legal Opinion

Mattson v. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1914No. 11555PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Che-. halis county, Irwin, J., entered June 16, 1912, upon the ■ verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee in a sawmill.

1Opinion of the Court

Ellis, J.-

-The plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries received by him while at work as a common laborer in the defendant’s saw mill. The plaintiff is a Finn and cannot speak, read, write, or understand the English language. He had been working for the defendant for about two weeks, during which time he was engaged in loading cars. On the morning of July 31, 1911, the defendant’s foreman took him ¡to the shipping shed, where lumber is piled to await shipping, and directed him to work there piling lumber, indicating the place where he was to work. There were already many…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. VanceWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Swanson v. Pacific Shipping Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Spoar v. Turn-VereinWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hayworth v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Carr v. Sacramento Clay Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Myers v. Little Church by the Side of the RoadWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Miller v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Thurman v. KildallWashington Supreme Court · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API