Legal Opinion

Layne v. Malmgren

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1929No. Docket No. 6762PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An action to recover .damages for alleged deceit in connection with the sale by defendant Malmgren to the plaintiff of a promissory note secured by a chattel mortgage and a deed of trust.

Defendant Dempsey, who was a real estate broker, acted for defendant Malmgren in the transaction. The Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation, on November 28, 1924, as surety for defendant Dempsey, issued to the real estate commissioner its bond in the form prescribed by the Real Estate Brokers’ Act, and was joined as a defendant in the action. A general demurrer filed by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Robinson v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kornblum v. ArthursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Nittler v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Guy v. BrennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Robinson v. Missouri Real Estate CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Greenlake Capital, LLC v. Bingo Investments, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Brooks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Ericson v. SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API