Layne v. Malmgren
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An action to recover .damages for alleged deceit in connection with the sale by defendant Malmgren to the plaintiff of a promissory note secured by a chattel mortgage and a deed of trust.
Defendant Dempsey, who was a real estate broker, acted for defendant Malmgren in the transaction. The Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation, on November 28, 1924, as surety for defendant Dempsey, issued to the real estate commissioner its bond in the form prescribed by the Real Estate Brokers’ Act, and was joined as a defendant in the action. A general demurrer filed by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Robinson v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kornblum v. ArthursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Nittler v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Guy v. BrennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Robinson v. Missouri Real Estate CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Greenlake Capital, LLC v. Bingo Investments, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Brooks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Ericson v. SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.