Kornblum v. Arthurs
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of tlie Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. S. Noyes, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in tbe opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenstlaw, J.
Plaintiff sued to rescind a contract for the purchase of real estate and to recover the portion of the purchase price which he had paid, upon the ground that he was induced to enter into the contract by false and fraudulent representations made by the vendor. Lot 23 in “Venice of America Tract,” which is the subject-matter of this controversy, is -one of a series of twelve lots, identical in size, constituting the southwesterly portion of block 2, a business block of the town. The fraudulent representation relied on as the basis for rescission was the alleged statement to plaintiff by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Keller v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bancroft & Co. v. HeringhiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by18 opinions
- Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Cross v. MayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- The Atkins Corporation v. TournyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.