Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Ronald E. Alexander and Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1996No. 94-4229PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J., joined by Engel, J.,
MILBURN, J. (pp.---), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge.
In this legal malpractice case, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which has taken over for the now-dissolved *1105Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC),1 appeals from a grant of summary judgment for the defendants, an attorney and his law firm. The district court held that Ohio’s one-year statute of limitations barred the malpractice claim, which arose out of events that occurred in 1986 involving the defendants and the First Savings and Loan Company of Massillon, Ohio (First Savings). We agree…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Flowers v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Omni-Food & Fashion, Inc. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Helen Charash v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sandra Maxwell Griffin v. Shirley A. Rogers, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Walker v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Willis v. New World Van Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- United States v. GarnoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- DirecTV, Inc. v. KarpinskyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.