Legal Opinion
DirecTV, Inc. v. Karpinsky
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 17, 2003No. 02-CV-73929PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT KARPINSKY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING COUNTER-DEFENDANTS DIRECTV’S AND HUGHES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING KARPINSKY’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIMS; AND DENYING KAR-PINSKY’S MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS
STEEH, District Judge.
Eugene Karpinsky moves for summary judgment of DirecTV’s claims of: unauthorized reception of satellite signals in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605(a); unauthorized interception of satellite communication in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2511(l)(a); possession of pirate access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DirecTV, Inc. v. CardonaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Directv, Inc. v. BarnesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- Directv, Inc. v. GuzziDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- DirecTV Inc. v. DeskinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- DirecTV, Inc. v. BoonstraDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.