Legal Opinion

United States v. Garno

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 13, 1997No. 5:96-cv-60260PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HACKETT, District Judge.

This is an eviction action in which the federal government claims that it is entitled to title and possession of the land upon which defendants live. On the other hand, defendants challenge the validity of the foreclosure proceedings under which the government claims entitlement to the land and seek judicial review of a prior adverse administrative decision. Now before the court is the government’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the government’s motion shall be granted.

I. FACTS

For over 28…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sweet Air Investment, Inc v. KenneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Worthy v. World Wide Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  3. State Bank v. Miller (In Re Miller)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Kubicki v. Mortgage Electronic Registration SystemsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State Bank of Florence v. Miller (In Re Miller)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API