Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Bradbury

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 2004No. 02C-21814; A121744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiffs, the prevailing parties in Kerr v. Bradbury, 193 Or App 304, 89 P3d 1227 (2004), petition for an award of attorney fees of $20,041.50. They contend that we are authorized to award such fees by virtue of the inherent power of the courts recognized in Deras v. Myers, 272 Or 47, 65-66, 535 P2d 541 (1975), to award fees “in cases where the plaintiff brings suit in a representative capacity and succeeds in protecting the rights of others as much as his own.” The Secretary of State objects, arguing that a fee award under Deras is not appropriate in this case. We allow the petition and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Swett v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dennehy v. City of GreshamOregon Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Oregonian Publishing Co., LLC v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Bates v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API