Legal Opinion

In re Dole

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1903PublishedCited by 65 opinions

Original.

1Opinion of the Court

*555OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J. (Galbraith, L, dissenting in fart.)

The respondent, Eleanor G. Dole, by her next friend, brought a bill in equity for maintenance against her husband, the petitioner Edmund P..Dole, before the other respondent, the Circuit Judge, and incidentally prayed for costs, counsel fee and temporary maintenance. After a hearing on a demurrer to the bill for want of jurisdiction and on an order to show cause why temporary maintenance, &c., should not be granted, the Judge, held that equity had jurisdiction and ordered the petitioner herein to pay certain sums for costs…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Galland v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Harding v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State ex rel. Gercke v. SeddonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Halberg v. YoungHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Chapman v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1961
  3. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. FergusonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Carter v. GearHawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lang v. LangWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API