Legal Opinion
State v. Graham
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 29, 1997No. AC 15121PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The state appeals from the judgment of the trial court imposing a ninety day suspended sentence following the defendant’s conviction for violating General Statutes § 14-215 (c).1 The state claims that the trial court improperly failed to impose the mandatory minimum thirty day jail sentence. The defendant claims that the trial court properly imposed the suspended sentence pursuant to § 14-215 (b) because the state failed to present a two part information in accordance with Practice Book § 619,2 State v. Torma, 21 Conn. *14App. 496, 574 A.2d 828 (1990), and State v. Jones, 234…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. DardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Patron v. KonoverConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Whitaker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. JamesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. HiltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002