Legal Opinion

State v. Hilton

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 19, 2002No. AC 20883Published

1Opinion of the Court

*681 Opinion

2Per curiam

The pro se defendant, Michael Hilton,1 also known as Jeromie Thorpe, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for the correction of an illegal sentence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On April 7, 1995, a jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty of murder, possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent and possession of narcotics. The court rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict and sentenced the defendant to an effective prison term of sixty years. This court, on direct appeal, affirmed the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. State v. HiltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API