Legal Opinion
Patron v. Konover
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 3, 1996No. 15057PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The controlling issue in this appeal is whether the trial court, on remand from this court, exceeded the specific directions of our mandate. We agree with the defendants that the trial court exceeded our mandate and we reverse that court’s judgment in part.
The plaintiffs brought suit to recover for the defendants’ alleged breach of a contract concerning the defendants’ purchase of the plaintiffs’ interests in real properties and business entities. On December 30,1992, the trial court, O’Neill, J., rendered judgment for the plaintiffs in the amount of $2,874,334.27 plus costs. On April 5,1993,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Lutynski v. B. B. & J. Trucking, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Mazzotta v. BornsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Oakley v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gary Excavating Co. v. Town of North HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Bailey v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Sosin v. SosinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Matey v. Estate of DemberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.