Legal Opinion

United States v. Covarrubias

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1999No. 98-30167PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises out of the questioning of defendants by state and federal officers before and after the appointment of counsel. The arrest of defendants Ascencio Daniel Covarrubias and Juan Luis Ochoa was planned and executed by officers of the Sunnyside Police Department with the assistance of a federal immigration agent. The local police and the federal agent both conducted interrogations of the defendants about possible state and federal crimes. The charges against the defendants, initially filed in state court, were dismissed, and the defendants were…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Texas v. CobbSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. Angelica LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Jose Roman Ortega, AKA Romualdo Roman Ortega, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re Network Associates, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
  5. United States v. Shawn Tyrone PercyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API