Texas v. Cobb
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches not only to the offense with which he is charged, but to other offenses “closely related factually” to the charged offense. We hold that our decision in McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U. S. 171 (1991), meant what it said, and that the Sixth Amendment right is “offense specific.”
In December 1993, Lindsey Owings reported to the Walker County, Texas, Sheriff’s Office that the home he *165shared with his wife, Margaret, and their 16-month-old daughter, Kori Rae, had been burglarized. He also…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by413 opinions
- Montejo v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Rothgery v. Gillespie CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
408 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.