Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Roman Ortega, AKA Romualdo Roman Ortega, Opinion

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 2000No. 98-10323PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

Jose Roman Ortega appeals his jury conviction and sentence for multiple drug— and firearm-related offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM.

In doing so, we find that an INS agent violated the Sixth Amendment when he obtained, outside the presence of Ortega’s counsel, Ortega’s statement regarding the firearm used during the offenses. The tainted statement, however, may still be used for impeachment purposes. We also find that the district court did not err by limiting Ortega’s cross-examination of the INS agent to only inculpatory portions of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Scott Allen McDaniel (03-1940) and Gregory Warren Wade (03-2073)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine KhamisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API