Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1991No. 90-242PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

This court has recognized that an employee who, pursuant to a labor-management agreement, accepts termination in lieu of a reassignment or involuntary layoff is entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. Bockover v. Ludlow Corp. (1986), 23 Ohio St. 3d 190, 23 OBR 352, 492 N.E. 2d 149. This case asks us to decide whether an employee is entitled to unemployment benefits where the employer, due to lack of work for its employees, offers a plan of voluntary termination and an employee, who because of seniority would not have been laid off or reassigned, consents to termination under the terms…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Budd Co. v. MercerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Krupa v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Bockover v. Ludlow Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Diehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (ESAB Group, Inc.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Hartless v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Peterson v. Director, Odjfs, Unpublished Decision (4-20-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. Parker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API