Ford Motor Co. v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.
This court has recognized that an employee who, pursuant to a labor-management agreement, accepts termination in lieu of a reassignment or involuntary layoff is entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. Bockover v. Ludlow Corp. (1986), 23 Ohio St. 3d 190, 23 OBR 352, 492 N.E. 2d 149. This case asks us to decide whether an employee is entitled to unemployment benefits where the employer, due to lack of work for its employees, offers a plan of voluntary termination and an employee, who because of seniority would not have been laid off or reassigned, consents to termination under the terms…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Budd Co. v. MercerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Krupa v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Bockover v. Ludlow Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by16 opinions
- Diehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (ESAB Group, Inc.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hartless v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Peterson v. Director, Odjfs, Unpublished Decision (4-20-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. Parker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.