Legal Opinion

Bockover v. Ludlow Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1986No. 85-446PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

As is relevant to the within appeal, R.C. 4141.29 provides:

“Each eligible individual shall receive benefits as compensation for loss of remuneration due to involuntary total or partial unemployment in the amounts and subject to the conditions stipulated in sections 4141.01 to 4141.46 of the Revised Code.
“(A) No individual is entitled to a waiting period or benefits for any week unless he: * *
“(5) Is unable to obtain suitable work. a * * *
“(D) Notwithstanding division (A) of this section, no individual may serve a waiting period or be paid benefits under the following conditions: * *
“(2) For…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Dougherty v. TorrenceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Twin Valley Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mt. Healthy Board of Education v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API