Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. Pitzer
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The material allegations of the appellee’s •complaint are these : That the son of the appellee, aged seven years and two months, without the fault or negligence of his parents, wandered to the depot of the appellant, in the city of Kokomo, and was carelessly and negligently permitted to *181get on one of its passenger trains which stopped for five minutes at that depot; that the child was carried to Jackson station ; that the conductor of the appellant’s train “ wrongfully, carelessly and negligently put the child, Arthur Pitzer, off at that station, without leaving him in charge of any person,…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Penso v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.