State ex rel. Committee for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. White
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Relators claim that they are entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to submit Ordinance No. 3543-99 to the electors for their consideration on the November 7 general election ballot. We agree, and for the reasons that follow we grant the writ requested by relators.
Initially we must address respondents’ contention that relators’ cause of action is barred by the doctrine of laches. Respondents contend that relators failed to act with the diligence and promptness required in election cases and, further, that relators lack any justifiable excuse for failing to file this action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. White v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Manos v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- St. Paul Citizens for Human Rights v. City Council of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In re Election Contest of Democratic Primary ElectionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Bittinger v. Corporation of BolivarWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Lorain Ordinance No. 77-01 v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Oster v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Stutzman v. Madison County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Carberry v. City of AshtabulaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.