Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oster v. Lorain County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2001No. 01-1639PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

On June 7, 2001, the Council of respondent city of Lorain, Ohio, enacted Ordinance No. 77-01, which reclassified approximately 202.7 acres of land from R-1A “Residential” to R-PUD “Residential Planned Unit Development.” Intervening respondent, Committee for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 77-01, Citizens for a Better Lorain (“committee”), circulated a referendum petition requesting that Ordinance No. 77-01 be submitted to Lorain voters at the November 6, 2001 general election.

Circulators of the petition applied the following procedure, which is the usual and customary manner in which petition…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SinitoOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Gains v. RossiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rust v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. City of Toledo v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Lorain Ordinance No. 77-01 v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Moore v. MaloneOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Moore v. MaloneOhio Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API