Legal Opinion

In re Election Contest of Democratic Primary Election

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 2000No. 99-1941PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Election Contest: Applicable Standards

Durkin challenges the May 4, 1999 primary election for the office of Clerk of the Youngstown Municipal Court. In evaluating Durkin’s election contest, we are guided by several, well-established precepts.

Initially, “courts should be very reluctant to interfere with elections, except to enforce rights or mandatory or ministerial duties as required by law.” State ex rel. Taft v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 480, 481, 692 N.E.2d 560, 562; MacDonald v. Bernard (1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 85, 86, 1 OBR 122, 123, 438 N.E.2d 410, 411-412.

Addi…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Duncan v. Chippewa Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rice v. CertainTeed Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. BSW Development Group v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. MassengaleOhio Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gaydosh v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cadwallader v. ScovannerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State ex rel. Committee for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Stutzman v. Madison County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API