Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Hicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 16, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 17, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment as an administrative assistant without good cause when she failed to contact the employer, in a timely manner, regarding her absence from work after December 31, 2002. Although claimant asserts that she contacted the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of OkuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of CornsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SundinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of MarteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API