Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Oku

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 6, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 1, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant, a security guard, was to be reassigned after the client requested that he be removed. Claimant was given a counseling memorandum regarding allegations that he was sleeping on the job. Although he was told to wait to speak to the scheduling manager for a new assignment, claimant left after a period of time and did not return. Significantly, claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of CornsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of Kam Wing TamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API