Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Marte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 6, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

*774Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, a truck driver helper, was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he refused a reasonable request of the employer to make a delivery to New Jersey. Although claimant maintained that he was unfamiliar with the route, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MarcanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API