Legal Opinion

United States v. MacAndrews & Forbes Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 37 opinions

On Demurrer to Indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

The indictment demurred to alleges violations of sections 1 and 2 of the act of July 2, 1890 (chapter 647, 26 Stat. 209 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200)), commonly known as the “Sherman Anti-Trust Law,” and contains three counts, the first charging a combination, and the second a conspiracy in restraint of interstate trade and commerce, while the third asserts an attempt to monopolize a portion of the same. All the counts are based upon the same allegations of fact, and, in effect, assert that the same doings, facts, and circumstances constitute at once a combination,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  3. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  4. American Medical Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API