Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Surplus Insurance Services

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 24, 1993No. 09-91-270 CVPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This appeal results from the trial court’s overruling of appellant’s motion for new trial after the granting of summary judgment. Appellant alleges in his motion for new trial that he did not receive notice of the summary judgment hearing. The trial court considered the evidence presented at hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial and determined that notice to appellant was sufficient, and that appellant failed to show his entitlement to a new trial.

Factually, the parties hereto had an agreement whereby appellant would be responsible to appellee for premiums…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Lopez v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Costello v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  5. Williams v. City of Angleton, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Limestone Construction, Inc. v. Summit Commercial Industrial Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  3. Etheredge v. Hidden Valley Airpark Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Mosser v. Plano Three Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  5. Stanley v. CitiFinancial Mortg. Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API