Legal Opinion

Williams v. City of Angleton

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 8, 1987No. 01-86-0180-CVPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Justice.

Our opinion issued October 23, 1986 is withdrawn and the following is substituted. Appellee’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

After the City of Angleton twice refused his requests for attorney’s fees, Paul Williams sued, claiming that an ordinance required the City to reimburse him for attorney’s fees he incurred while serving on the Angleton City Council. The trial court granted summary judgment for the City.

Williams contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for continuance of the summary judgment hearing, because the City gave him less than 21 days…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Insurance Co. v. Herman G. West, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. O'Connor v. TownsTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Wood v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Smith v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Halbert v. San Saba Springs Land & Live Stock Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BlakeTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gonzales v. Surplus Insurance Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1993
  3. Krchnak v. Fulton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
  4. Cronen v. City of Pasadena, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  5. Hammonds v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API