Legal Opinion

Mosser v. Plano Three Venture

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 19, 1994No. 05-94-00057-CVPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITTINGTON, Justice.

In this appeal, we must decide whether a party who never receives notice of a summary judgment hearing is required to comply with the requirements set out in Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc., 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124 (1939) to obtain a new trial. We conclude that it does not. Appellant James Mosser, a homeowner, sued appellees to enforce and amend restrictive covenants in a planned residential community. Appellees filed a motion for summary judgment and, after a hearing, the trial judge granted ap-pellees’ motion. On appeal, appellant contends the judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Texas Integrated Conveyor Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Conveyor Concepts, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  2. Texas Sting, Ltd. v. R.B. Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  3. Etheredge v. Hidden Valley Airpark Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Wesco Distribution, Inc. v. Westport Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API