Mosser v. Plano Three Venture
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHITTINGTON, Justice.
In this appeal, we must decide whether a party who never receives notice of a summary judgment hearing is required to comply with the requirements set out in Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc., 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124 (1939) to obtain a new trial. We conclude that it does not. Appellant James Mosser, a homeowner, sued appellees to enforce and amend restrictive covenants in a planned residential community. Appellees filed a motion for summary judgment and, after a hearing, the trial judge granted ap-pellees’ motion. On appeal, appellant contends the judgment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Texas Integrated Conveyor Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Conveyor Concepts, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Texas Sting, Ltd. v. R.B. Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Etheredge v. Hidden Valley Airpark Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Continental Casualty Co. v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Wesco Distribution, Inc. v. Westport Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.