Legal Opinion
Michael Simon Design, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 18, 2010No. 2009-1571PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, three importers of foreign-made goods, filed actions in the Court of International Trade challenging certain modifications to the U.S. tariff schedule made by Presidential proclamation. The Court of International Trade denied the appellants’ request for judicial review of the modifications. We affirm.
I
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) is the United States’ implementation of the 1983 International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (“the Convention”), which created a single international system…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Silfab Solar, Inc. v. United States, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, Chairman Rhonda K. Schmidtlein, Comm'r Kevin K. McAleenan, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Representative Robert E. Lighthizer, Solarworld Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Usp Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- WWRD U.S., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- In Zone Brands, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Silfab Solar, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.