Legal Opinion

Silfab Solar, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 5, 2018No. Slip Op. 18–15; Court No. 18–00023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stanceu, Chief Judge:

*1297Plaintiffs Silfab Solar, Inc., Heliene, Inc., Canadian Solar (USA), Inc., and Canadian Solar Solutions, Inc. move for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prohibit defendants from subjecting plaintiffs' products to "safeguard" measures, in the form of temporary import duties, that the United States recently imposed on imports of certain crystalline silicon photovoltaic ("CSPV") cells and certain products (including "modules") that contain such cells.

Because plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate a likelihood that they will succeed on the merits of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Dalton v. SpecterSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Ugine and Alz Belgium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API