Legal Opinion

Dry v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1948No. Civ. 13512PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Defendant failed to file an adequate record on appeal in the above entitled matter. After the original opinion had been filed defendant presented a motion to augment the record. That motion was granted, which requires a modification of the opinion. A petition for rehearing was granted and the matter submitted. After reconsideration of the record as augmented we are convinced that the opinion heretofore filed correctly disposed of this appeal. The opinion has been redrafted in view of the augmented record and is as follows:

The appeal, as appears in the trial court minute record, is from an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Parker v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Vertson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. De Felice v. TaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. People v. VinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. RaquelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Celli v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API