People v. Raquel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of violation of section 288 of the Penal Code and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
There would appear to be no reason for a detailed summary of the evidence at the trial. It is sufficient to note that an examination of the transcript discloses ample evidence to sustain the judgment. Defendant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial; that it was error for the court to permit the district attorney to interrogate him concerning prior conviction and his service of time therefor; and that he was denied the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Perry v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. HectorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. CorderoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. HoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. GarnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. SchaletzkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.