Vertson v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This action was instituted to recover damages from the City of Los Angeles and the Department of Water and Power of said city for personal injuries.
The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, compensation insurance carrier for Francisco and Ellington, plaintiff’s employers, who were independent contractors with said City of Los Angeles, obtained permission to intervene in the action and filed a complaint in intervention seeking to recover from the City of Los Angeles and its Department of Water and Power certain sums of money theretofore paid by said insurance carrier to plaintiff under…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Diller v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Connor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lejeune v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Slemons v. PatersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Weddle v. LogesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.