Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Miska

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1975No. 44284PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This litigation arises out of an automobile collision at an 1 intersection of two rural roads in Polk County.

The jury found that both plaintiff and decedent were negligent but that the negligence of plaintiff was alone the direct cause of the collision. Appealing from an order denying his post-trial motion for judgment n. o. v. or for a new trial, plaintiff contends (1) that decedent’s negligence was a direct cause of the collision as a matter of law, (2) that plaintiff, because of amnesia, is entitled to a common-law presumption of due care, and (3) that testimony on behalf…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Simon v. CarrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Pluwak v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Seivert v. BassSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Aasen v. AasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Steinhaus v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Industrial Electric & Equipment ServiceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Willman v. WallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. In Re the Welfare of C.P.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Koehnle v. M.W. Ettinger, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Lutz v. Lilydale Grand Central Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API