Legal Opinion
Koehnle v. M.W. Ettinger, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1984No. C5-83-1692, C4-83-1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal arising out of a wrongful death action. Appellant Koehnle appeals from an order of the trial court denying her motion for a new trial and from the judgment entered. Appellant claims that she was denied a fair trial based on several erroneous evidentiary rulings. The second appeal involves an indemnification issue between respondent Pinto and respondent M.W. Ettinger because of a service agreement.
FACTS
On September 25, 1979, a Minnesota Highway Department crew was patching a couple of holes in the northerly (right-hand) westbound lane of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Guile v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- O'CONNELL v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Poppler v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Helm v. El Rehbein & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Larson v. Anderson, Taunton & Walsh, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Art Goebel, Inc. v. Northern Suburban Agencies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- BAE Systems Land & Armaments, L.P. v. Ibis Tek, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016