Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of C.P.W.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 21, 1999No. C6-99-596PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*206OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.*

The state appeals the district court’s conclusion that it failed to demonstrate probable cause that C.P.W. committed criminal vehicular homicide and operation when he pursued J.M.P. in a high-speed car chase and J.M.P. crashed into two other vehicles, injuring several people and killing one person. Because we find the state presented substantial evidence that C.P.W.’s actions were a proximate cause of the injuries and death, and J.M.P.’s decision to run a red light was not a superseding intervening cause, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On September 27, 1998, a group…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Ogle v. AvinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998
  4. Lennon v. PieperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Doe v. F.P., Diocese of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Welfare of C.M.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. State v. HoferCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In Re CMACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. In Re the Welfare of C.P.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API